🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."