🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as arguably the deadliest – and significant – days in three decades of violence in the region.

Within the community of the incident – the images of the tragic events are visible on the walls and embedded in people's minds.

A civil rights march was held on a wintry, sunny afternoon in Derry.

The protest was a protest against the practice of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been implemented following an extended period of conflict.

Troops from the specialized division shot dead 13 people in the Bogside area – which was, and remains, a strongly republican population.

A specific visual became notably iconic.

Photographs showed a Catholic priest, the priest, displaying a stained with blood white handkerchief while attempting to protect a crowd carrying a young man, the fatally wounded individual, who had been killed.

News camera operators documented extensive video on the day.

The archive features Fr Daly telling a journalist that soldiers "appeared to shoot indiscriminately" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

This account of what happened wasn't accepted by the initial investigation.

The first investigation concluded the soldiers had been shot at first.

During the negotiation period, the administration set up a fresh examination, in response to advocacy by surviving kin, who said the initial inquiry had been a cover-up.

That year, the report by Lord Saville said that generally, the military personnel had fired first and that not one of the casualties had posed any threat.

At that time Prime Minister, the Prime Minister, expressed regret in the Parliament – declaring killings were "unjustified and unacceptable."

Authorities began to examine the matter.

A military veteran, known as the defendant, was charged for homicide.

Indictments were filed concerning the killings of the first individual, twenty-two, and twenty-six-year-old the second individual.

The accused was also accused of trying to kill Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, more people, an additional individual, and an unknown person.

Remains a court ruling maintaining the veteran's identity protection, which his legal team have maintained is required because he is at danger.

He testified the investigation that he had solely shot at individuals who were carrying weapons.

That claim was disputed in the official findings.

Material from the examination could not be used directly as testimony in the court case.

During the trial, the accused was shielded from sight using a protective barrier.

He spoke for the initial occasion in the proceedings at a hearing in that month, to answer "not guilty" when the accusations were put to him.

Kin of those who were killed on the incident journeyed from Londonderry to the courthouse every day of the case.

A family member, whose sibling was died, said they were aware that hearing the trial would be emotional.

"I remember all details in my recollection," the relative said, as we examined the primary sites discussed in the case – from the location, where the victim was shot dead, to the adjacent the courtyard, where the individual and another victim were died.

"It even takes me back to where I was that day.

"I assisted with Michael and put him in the ambulance.

"I went through each detail during the testimony.

"But even with having to go through all that – it's still worthwhile for me."